THƏ DEFINITE ARTICLE
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Year Abroad
  • Current Affairs
  • Linguistics
  • Interviews
  • Visual Arts
  • Cuisine
  • Music
  • TDA in Translation
  • New Page

The case of Matthew Hedges and the evaluation of academic permissions

25/11/2018

2 Comments

 
Irini Picolou 

Undoubtedly, the case of Matthew Hedges, the Durham academic who received a life sentence in the UAE for allegedly spying against the state, is a major devastation for the entire university community and even more so for his close family. To have your whole life taken away from you in less than five minutes, which is how long his trial lasted, in a foreign country, crippling with uncertainty and horror in a cold isolated court, is beyond even some of our worst nightmares.

This case does raise a particularly significant, however, even if somewhat cynical and critical message, for the academic community in particular. Without being able to make a comprehensive judgement on the level of support and surveillance Hedges’ academic proposal received, as a young academic, the naivety of tackling such issues is plausible. For this reason, the university should be striving to protect their PhD students at their highest level of potency, even if it means including some restrictions on certain proposals. As undoubtedly invaluable as this research may have proved to be at first glance, this case does raise questions about the degree of academic liberalism that should be permitted by the university. Despite the confirmation from the foreign office that Matthew was not working as a spy, this did not stop a court ruling determining a life sentence of 25 years as well as a brutal confiscation of his materials and belongings.

We must therefore turn to the questions, what security procedures are utilised when attributing funding to a PhD proposal or acceptance, if any? It is time that the university carefully consider the position and the power of the country even within what is considered to be one of its allies. It is easy to lose touch of the wider contexts and global issues that exist beyond the realms of academia, and although this is an event which never should have occurred, it is an important creation of a pressing need to re-evaluate and refine security procedures in such proposals dealing with transnational sensitivities in foreign countries that exist beyond our reach. To what degree was this proposal evaluated, questioned and considered? Perhaps not to a great extent; as, as it has been shown, his research in the UAE involved a great risk, a risk which, in the end, he paid with his freedom. The power of the country to save Matthew Hedges from the permanent execution of a life sentence is sadly limited and hence extremely uncertain at this point in time. Even if his case is eventually resolved, what sort of mark does this leave on one’s future? It is crucial to contemplate these issues on an individual level within their wider contexts, instead of attributing the main focus to academic appeal and interest.
​
Although this issue has many layers of complexity, such as the criticism of academic restriction and the limited information that the country itself may have about the specific security measures in each country, it is better to take precautions rather than to run the risk, especially with the rise of wider global issues such as terrorism and the tightening of security measures in global spheresre to edit.
2 Comments
anon.
25/11/2018 11:37:58 pm

The author fails to note that Hedges had close to 10 years experience working in the defense industries as a consultant and intelligence analyst in the middle east and the UAE before partaking on his PhD. This isn't some 21 year old fresh out of a BA. All of the interviews he was conducting, the material from which was used as the evidence of his alleged spying, were with contacts he had made whilst working in the defense industry. The author seems to think that the university should have prevented Hedges from conducting this research on the grounds that it was unsafe for him to do so. This view is both patronising and would lead to academic self censorship.

Reply
Anon.
4/12/2018 01:00:35 am

The article does not claim full responsibility on the university for Hedges' trial, however the university should have taken some precaution to a degree regardless of Hedges' own background as a PhD cannot be compared with undergraduate or even a masters degree, it is research which will be available worldwide hence as patronising as it may seem there does need to be an assessment of a risk both for the sake of the individual and the university as well as the limitations this may have on the study itself for the use of other researchers.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Read our past articles

    All
    27th October In Catalonia: Glory Or Blunder?
    A Different Ballpark To Anti-Semitism
    Anti-Zionism
    Christmas Spending In Europe Unwrapped
    Confessions Of A Bed-wetter
    Durham For Refugees In Calais
    Ethiopia Installs First Female President As The Nation Ushers In A New Era
    Femicide In Iraq: 'The Modern Witch Hunt'
    France Calls For A Ban On 'Excessively Thin' Models
    Germany
    Hurricane Maria- Is Puerto Rico “out Of Sight And Out Of Mind”?
    Is France's Glorification Of Revolution A Problem?
    Italy's Budget Crisis: Fiasco Or Fair Fiscal Fight?
    Modern Languages Outreach To Park View
    The Case Of Matthew Hedges And The Evaluation Of Academic Permissions
    The Erroneous Claim Of Monolithic Identity
    The Great European Disaster Movie
    The Language-Xenophobia Link
    The Rise Of The Far-right In Brazil: Implications Of Bolsonaro's Election

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from ell brown
  • Home
  • Travel
  • Year Abroad
  • Current Affairs
  • Linguistics
  • Interviews
  • Visual Arts
  • Cuisine
  • Music
  • TDA in Translation
  • New Page